Elected Constitutional Court judges Zsolt Szomora, Arpad Gabor Orosz, Miklos Ligeti, Andras Gyorgy Kovács and Nara Chronowski (L-R) take their oaths of office during the plenary session of the Parliament, 15 September 2026.

The new judges are Nora Chronowski, Miklos Ligeti, Andras Gyorgy Kovacs, Zsolt Szomora and Arpad Gabriel Orosz, all nominated by the governing Tisza Party.

Parliament elected new judges because the mandates of four judges, including court president Peter Polt, expired on Sept 1 after the 17th amendment to the Fundamental Law, adopted in July, stipulated that the mandate of a Constitutional Court judge ends at the age of 70. In November, Agnes Czine, the court's deputy president, will also leave the court for the same reason, after serving 12 years.

Parliament had 60 days to elect new judges to replace those leaving. The new judges were elected for nine years, after the 17th amendment to the Fundamental Law reduced the mandate from 12 to nine years. A two-thirds majority of MPs is required to elect Constitutional Court judges.

The newly elected Constitutional Court judges took their oath before Parliament.

Opposition parties Fidesz and the Christian Democrats (KDNP) had previously said they would not participate in the process of electing the judges, calling the procedure "illegitimate and a mockery of constitutionalism". For this reason, their MPs left the chamber before the secret ballot. The Our Homeland group, however, participated in the vote and nominated candidates.

Previously, the judges had made statements during their hearings.

Chronowski, a university professor, a doctor of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and a constitutional lawyer, called the democratic rule of law and human dignity the highest values of constitutionalism, which should guide the interpretation of the constitution. She also said the protection of individuals, minorities and vulnerable groups, and the examination of constitutional complaints, were important.

Kovacs, a council chair judge at the Curia with a PhD in administrative law, said that for a judge, there was no more uplifting and honourable task than to re-sharpen the constitutional practice created by the Constitutional Court of Laszlo Solyom, which brought about the change of regime. He added that the top court could further develop its practice to ensure that Hungary remained a functioning, consolidated democratic rule of law in the long term.

Ligeti, an ombudsman, a criminal lawyer, and the legal director of Transparency International Hungary, said the main task of the next period would be to rethink and rebuild the court. The "captured Constitutional Court" in many cases had not operated in the direction of the rule of law and had not been on the side of the disadvantaged, he added.

Orosz, a former head of the Civil College of the Kuria, a council chair judge in civil law, a European legal expert, and has been a lecturer at the University of Szeged since 1993, said the most important factor in restoring confidence in the court was the appointment of credible and independent members. He said it was important to know the circumstances and context of each case and to weigh the consequences of decisions.

Szomora, deputy director of the Institute of Criminal Sciences at the University of Szeged's Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, said he was a supporter of constitutional dialogue, believing that the separation of powers should not be seen as a confrontation. Conflict, he added, could have a weakening effect on the rule of law, while constitutional dialogue forced the representatives of the public power branches to reflect on each other and thus further build the constitutional state.

In late July, parliament already decided on a new Constitutional Court judge: Pal Sonnevend, a department head and former dean at ELTE's Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, was elected to replace Csaba Hende, a former Fidesz MP and defence minister. Hende left the body as a result of the 17th amendment to the Fundamental Law and the rules of the Constitutional Court law.

Fidesz: New constitutional judges 'illegitimate'

Parliament's process of electing new constitutional judges is "illegitimate", the opposition Fidesz Party said, adding that they would stay away from the procedure.

In a statement, deputies of Fidesz accused ruling Tisza of abusing its two-thirds majority, and "breaching Hungary's rule of law through personally tailored, retroactive legislation".

They also said Tisza's 17th amendment to the constitution led to "taking the institution of the president of the republic hostage" as well as to "beheading" the Constitutional Court. The branches of government, the statement added, were no longer separated in Hungary, while the system of checks and balances had been removed.

"Fidesz will not aid in creating autocratic rule ... but represent, organise, and promote resistance," they said.

Source: MTI – Hungary’s national news agency since 1881.

MTI photo 

*********************************************************************************************

You're very welcome to comment and discuss this via our Facebook page: XpatLoopNews 
& via: Budapest Expats - The International Community / Expats Hungary - The Original Group

You can subscribe to our newsletter here: XpatLoop.com/Newsletters