Updated: Concerning Findings Revealed After Venice Commission Examines Sovereignty Protection Law in Hungary

  • 30 Mar 2024 5:48 AM
  • Hungary Matters
Updated: Concerning Findings Revealed After Venice Commission Examines Sovereignty Protection Law in Hungary
The Venice Commission said on Tuesday that it has examined Hungary’s law on sovereignty protection, focusing on provisions related to foreign election financing and the establishment and activities of the sovereignty protection office.

The advisory body to the Council of Europe said in a statement that the legal basis of the office as the protector of constitutional identity was questionable.

It said it was usual for state institutions to guarantee fundamental rights through the courts and law enforcement agencies, and the sovereignty protection office must not interfere with the constitutional powers of the courts and those agencies, adding that there was no evident need for such an office.

Moreover, guarantees under the law for the office’s independence were insufficient, it said, noting that the government was responsible for appointing and dismissing its top officials.

Further, the office’s powers were “extremely broad and vaguely defined”, with the risk that the office could interfere in the lives of private individuals.

The body argued that the arrangements may also stifle free and democratic debate in Hungary.

It also referred to restrictions on the foreign financing of political parties, arguing that whereas restrictive measures were in line with international standards in principle, the law’s provisions extended beyond electoral campaigns to cover political activity in a broader sense and campaigns for social change.

“The reason and need for such a broad approach have not been substantiated by the Hungarian authorities,” the body said.

The part of the law expanding a ban on accepting foreign financing was compatible with international standards, it said, only on condition that the provisions were amended to provide for certain exceptions of the new restrictions and for more precise definitions.

The body recommended repealing the parts of the law concerning the establishment of the sovereignty protection office and, among other things, recommended a more nuanced definition of the concept of “foreign support”, as well as a more precise definition of the prohibited activities and their foreign financing in the new provisions of the election law.

Sovereigny Protectio Office Rejects 'Accusations' of Venice Commission

The sovereignty protection office on Thursday rejected the Venice Commission’s report on Hungary’s sovereignty protection law, calling the report “biased, riddled with errors and politically motivated”.

The advisory body to the Council of Europe visited Hungary on February 15-16. In a statement on the findings issued on March 18, it said that the legal basis of the office as the protector of constitutional identity was questionable.

While the delegation met the sovereignty protection office’s head, “it is not on public record what other players or factors had a bearing on the Commission’s stance, besides Hungarian state organisations and opposition politicians,” the office said in a statement.

The Venice Commission’s report “was drafted to be used by various organisations of the European Union, for instance in infringement procedures against Hungary, and as a basis for political attacks against the country,” the office said.

The report’s “gravest factual error” was that it said the office had the right to conduct investigations, the sovereignty protection office said. The Commission also voiced concerns about what they said was a lack of legal remedy against the sovereignty protection office, it said. However, as the office was not an authority, such remedy was unnecessary, it said.

The report is biased as it questions legal practices such as the procedure of presidential election in Hungary, against which it had raised no concerns earlier, the sovereignty protection office’s statement said.

“The report also shows that the Commission is debating Hungary’s right to freely set up its institutions”. “In calling for scrapping the sovereignty protection law, the Venice Commission is clearly seeking to strip Hungary of the tools to protect its national autonomy and to stand up against foreign attempts of influence,” the statement said.

You're very welcome to comment, discuss and enjoy more stories, via our Facebook page: 
Facebook.com/XpatLoopNews + via XpatLoop’s groups: Budapest Expats / Expats Hungary

You can subscribe to our newsletter here:

Do you want your business to reach tens of thousands of potential high-value expat customers?
Then just contact us here!

  • How does this content make you feel?

XpatLoop Media Partner

Hungary Matters

Launched in January 2014, this newsletter published on week days covers 'everything you need to know about what’s going on in Hungary and beyond', according to its publisher the state media agency MTI.

Explore More Reports