Concerning the latter, the document said that Hungary’s reducing the tax in May resolves a number of the issues, and welcomed the Hungarian government’s openness to change the contested legislation.

It added, however, that the tax should be distributed evenly and without any discrimination, and said that the ailing media sector should not be overburdened. Concerning Hungary’s stipulations on media content restrictions, the Commission said those passages were not sufficiently clear and that they should apply the principle of proportionality.

The Commission voiced disagreement with a ban on criticising religious or political views, as well as with stipulations that media content cannot violate privacy rights, cases of which should be discussed by courts.

Authors of the document agreed that the state should fight slander, obscenity or hate speech, but said that the Hungarian legislation’s such concepts as ethics or constitutional order were too vague and allowed a too broad interpretation by courts.

According to the document, the composition of Hungary’s Media Council should also be changed so as to ensure representation of significant political and other groups, as well as that of the media.

The authority and selection of the head of the Council, who also heads the media authority, should also be changed to ease a concentration of authority and ensure political neutrality.

The document noted that changes made to those rules in 2013 were positive, but not sufficient to guarantee the actual independence of the Council. Hungary needs to find a way to make the Media Council a politically neutral body, it said, suggesting that the body’s members

Source www.hungarymatters.hu - Visit Hungary Matters to sign-up for MTI’s twice-daily newsletter.