The court ruled that the law discriminated against some investors when determining their eligibility for compensation.

Further, the law placed disproportionate ownership restrictions on investment service providers that were obliged to provide compensation, the court said, adding that these providers had not been given enough time to make preparations for complying with the law.

Quaestor investors were already eligible for compensation from the Investor Protection Fund (Beva) for up to 20,000 euros, but lawmakers approved legislation that effectively raised the threshold to about 100,000 euros, while leaving Beva members to cover the difference.

Beva earlier estimated the top-up fund would reach almost 100 billion forints (EUR 320m). Chairman of the top court Barnabás Lenkovics told MTI on Tuesday that the law on compensating Quaestor victims is repairable and can be made constitutional.

In the current form, the law is not applicable but this does not mean that its basic purpose is unconstitutional, he added. Hungary’s Banking Association welcomed the Constitutional Court ruling and called it a “good direction”.

Levente Kovács, general secretary of the association, told MTI that taxpayers “cannot be made to pay compensation to investors seeking higher than average yields”.

He argued that “hunting for profits” involves risk, which should be borne by those embarking on such business rather than by “people or organisations that have nothing to do with it”.

Hungarian banks work in a “regular and honest” way, and cannot be held responsible for the activities of brokerage companies outside the banking sector, Kovács said.

Fidesz said that it was the banks that had halted compensation for the victims by turning to the top court over the law. The party said the court’s decision brought into question whether victims of the fraud can be paid any interest as part of the compensation.

The opposition Socialist Party said it expects the government to swiftly compensate not just the victims of Quaestor but also those of Buda-Cash and Hungária, two other brokerages that went bust this year.

Party leader József Tóbiás called on Fidesz to clarify its position on the brokerage scandals and whether it “still wants to defend the central bank, which is clearly partly responsible” for the losses incurred by the defrauded. Tóbiás said the central bank’s financial responsibility for compensating victims should be written into law.

The opposition Együtt party said the central bank should pay for the portion of the compensation that cannot be financed from Quaestor’s assets.

Levente Pápa said his party does not consider the Constitutional Court a “legitimate judicial body”, arguing that it has been “reduced to nothing more than the government’s toy”. He said the ruling was “yet another episode in well-constructed stage act”, and the government and Fidesz had planned all along to draft a bill that was “impossible to comply with”.

Green opposition LMP said that after the court’s ruling the government should quit trying to “tweak” problematic parts of the law and instead offer a comprehensive solution.

Lawmaker Bernadett Szél said the compensation law was “all about Fidesz trying to distance itself from the scandal when it is obvious that it is very much involved”. She said victims must be compensated for the money they lost. Szél said LMP would continue to push for an investigative committee tasked with uncovering every scandal similar to the Quaestor bankruptcy and proposing regulations to prevent such scandals in the future.

The opposition Liberal Party welcomed the court’s decision and said that those responsible, and not the victims, should have to “pay for Quaestor’s crimes”.

On Tuesday afternoon, some 50 former Quaestor clients held a demonstration in front of the Constitutional Court building and demanded a new law to provide for their full compensation.

Source www.hungarymatters.hu - Visit Hungary Matters to sign-up for MTI’s twice-daily newsletter.